nanog: Re: co-location and access to your server

[Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>]

George Bonser wrote:
> Awesome.  It's good to know that there are still operations like that around.  That is probably found more often in 
> local providers and not so often in the big operations.  The more community oriented providers would be much more accepting 
> of such a situation than a large operation.
Community oriented provider, that's what I am talking about. I just 
couldn't find the right term.
> but having someone "on call" probably isn't that bad if it is infrequently needed.
I'd be willing to pay extra for access after hours, either a recurring 
fee or on a case by case basis. I am not searching for the cheapest 
option and demanding that in addition my car be detailed weekly. But 
just some co-locating space for one or a few servers where I don't have 
to plan a week ahead or miss half a day of $dayjob in order to work on 
it (which would cost me more).
Greetings,
Jeroen

--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html