Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: raging bulls
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:23:20 -0700

On 8/8/12 6:52 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
It seems to me that all the markets have been doing this the wrong way.
Would it now be more fair to use some kind of signed timestamp and
process all transactions in the order that they originated?
Given an uneven distribution of sizes it's kind of hard to fill orders in the order in which they arrived (unmatched orders are part of a normally functioning market). A large bid may require the accumulation of sell orders while smaller orders may be more easily matched. Some HF trading strategies of course rely on this. Today large orders may be filled on more than one ecn at a time so the notion of central agency in clearance is also a little challenging.
each trade could have a signed GPS tag with the absolute time on it. It
would keep everyone's trades in order no matter how latent their
connection to the market was.  All you would have to do is introduce a
couple of seconds delay to account for the longest circuit and then take
them in order.  They could certainly use less expensive connections and
ensure that international traders get a fair shake.
it's simpler to just locate the trading platforms in the same place and give everyone the same length cable. The incentives are in the wrong place too deliberately induce delay without some externality (like a regulator) guiding behavior.

If one sees current behavior as undesirable there are other methods such as the adjustment of transaction costs that might be more effective.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]