mailing list archives
Re: DNS Changer items
From: Stephen Wilcox <steve.wilcox () ixreach com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:46:52 +0100
FYI RIPE reallocated these blocks. Whilst I understand they didn't want the
court order, this seems a bit silly, doesn't that now make the machines
residing in these blocks special - even if the owners arent miscreants, it
makes them a viable target.
inetnum: 18.104.22.168 - 22.214.171.124
descr: Aurimas Rapalis trading as "II Hosting Media"
inetnum: 126.96.36.199 - 188.8.131.52
descr: Inevo Labs SRL
On 13 July 2012 19:48, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Seth Mattinen" <sethm () rollernet us>
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:20:55 -0400, Andrew Fried said:
The dns-ok.us site is getting crushed from all the sudden media
One wonders why it's so hard to get the media interested when it
would be *helpful*. DNS Changer gets traction like 3 days before the
drop dead date, IPv6 gets on the radar *after* we run out of v4 /8's
to give to regionals, etc...
Reactive is easier to justify to the powers that be than proactive.
It's easier to justify *not* being smart enough to deal with the problem
when it doesn't cause a major disruption?
When it isn't causing a major problem, the powers that be have a harder
time understanding the need to act.
Once it is causing a major disruption, the powers that be have no trouble
understanding the need to act.
This is not veneration of stupidity, it is human nature. Often summarized
in the colloquialism "The squeaky wheel gets the grease."
Director / Founder
IX Reach Ltd
E: steve.wilcox () ixreach com
M: +44 7966 048633
Tempus Court, Bellfield Road, High Wycombe, HP13 5HA, UK.
- Re: DNS Changer items Stephen Wilcox (Aug 15)