Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: DNS Changer items
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:34:08 -0400

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:51:32 -0400, Randy Whitney said:

Perhaps it should not have been re-allocated at all, rather than cause
the unsuspecting allocatee trouble they would not have seen from
clean(er) space.

"unsuspecting"??!?

You want a clean prefix, get some IPv6 space instead.  Anybody who is
getting IPv4 space in 2012 and doesn't realize that they're getting "scraping
the bottom of the barrel" quality prefixes will get what they deserve for
not doing their due diligence (i.e. paying attention the last decade or so).

Attachment: _bin
Description:


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]