Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: IRR-clueful person at 3356?
From: "Michael Hallgren" <m.hallgren () free fr>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:21:33 +0000

Yes, usually something like "accept r/n" iff "there is a route object 'covering' r/n and the 'origin AS' of r/n is in 
the AS-set of the neighbor AS.

-----Message d'origine-----
De:Mike Simkins
Envoyé: 17/08/2012, 18:04 
A: jlewis () lewis org; rs () seastrom com
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Objet:Re: IRR-clueful person at 3356?

That's the sort of thing we have in Europe, downstream customer need to be
in your AS-SET for filtering purposes

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jlewis () lewis org]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:29 AM
To: Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Cc: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: IRR-clueful person at 3356?

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

The telemetry I'm getting (thirdhand and believed to originate from
first line support) suggests that both Level(3)'s direct customer and
any downstreams of that customer need to be in the same IRR component.

Can't say for sure if it's true, but I've been told the same thing by
Level3 support.

  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]