Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fair Use Policy
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:25:05 -0400

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
On 8/22/12, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie () gmail com> wrote:
I how you are talking about 3G or there is a typo.
An ISP with a 5GB cap that is charging the end user more then 5$ total
{including line rental} a month should not be allow to operate.

I don't believe $5 even covers an ISP's typical cost of having a line,
let alone getting data through it, maintaining, supporting it, and
providing upstream networking.

If you're talking mobile (3G) then you don't have a physical line. You
have a device which might or might not be making any use of a shared
media (wireless spectrum).

A 56kbps modem can theoretically deliver 18GB of data in a month. My
$125/mo business fios can cough up 8 TB in that time. 5GB on a modern
shared wireless media is... not much.

Why should the end users who transfer less than 1GB a month, with only
basic web surfing, have to suffer periods of less-than-excellent
network performance  or pay increasing costs to subsidize the purchase
of additional capacity for users at the same service level expecting
to use 100GB a month?

They shouldn't. The folks who want to use 100 GB a month should be
paying more than $5. ;)

Even if   the metric is wrong --  the idea of metering bytes
transferred is broken,
because it does not positively reinforce the good behavior.

Works for the electric company, the gas company, the water company,
etc. Metering I mean, not a use cap. The notion of a cap is pretty

Bill Herrin

William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]