Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: has been Allocated
From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:04:06 -0500

I wonder if ATT will be returning some of those /16 and /15 allocations it has in return for the /12 - http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/SIS-80/nets

How does one suddenly justify needing 1,000,000 more IP addresses (explosive expected growth in the next couple months?)


Owen DeLong wrote the following on 8/23/2012 1:29 AM:
AT&T should just be glad there was a /12 for them to get.

That isn't going to be true for much longer.

If you are counting on an IPv4 free pool to run your business next year, you are making a bad bet.


On Aug 22, 2012, at 22:54 , "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com> wrote:

My apologies again, I saw it as and not

I've been working long hours last couple nights. Yeah you are probably right, since they to pulled that one very close 
to RFC1918.


I would hate to be AT&T for this IP allocation. Heck, I would simple push more IPv6 if I were them.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan White [mailto:dwhite () olp net]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:37 AM
To: Otis L. Surratt, Jr.
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: has been Allocated

You can do a whois search at arin.net to see the allocation. is often confused with the private address
space, which I would consider a 'scraping the bottom of the barrel'

I also noticed a couple of subnets in that range showing up in the weekly
Cidr reports, beginning in July.

On 08/23/12 00:29 -0500, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:

Can you provide a link to support this?
If this is true, I wonder how this will work.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan White [mailto:dwhite () olp net]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:24 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: has been Allocated was allocated on 2012-08-20 to AT&T Internet
Dan White

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]