Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
From: David Lamparter <equinox () opensourcerouting org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:26:27 +0200

Personally I would like to see more work on all three opensource
implementations, i.e. BIRD, OpenBGPd and Quagga.

http://opensourcerouting.org/ to the rescue?

Hi, I'm David Lamparter, employed at the OpenSourceRouting (OSR) project
to maintain Quagga.

I can tell you that the OSR's interest is in providing a stable
open-source routing platform for actual switches/routers (with either a
software or hardware forwarding plane).  Quagga and BIRD were considered
equally; Quagga's single-RIB design and existence of isisd were what
tipped the scales.

We primarily perform conformance and scale testing and fix/enhance in
those areas; also we support 3rd parties in cleaning and submitting
Quagga patches/features.

OSPF and IS-IS are stronger targets currently since they need more work
than BGP, and also Euro-IX already did much of the latter.  Merging that
is on the TODO, but it's a lot of work.  Even as a Quagga maintainer, I
must currently recommend against using mainline Quagga as a route
server.  Please use Euro-IX Quagga, and if you can/want, convince your
decisionmakers to support Chris Hall on that -- I've been told future
work on the Euro-IX Quagga branch is not certain.

There's been a BoF on RIPE64 with OSR, BIRD and Quagga involvement.
There'll be one at RIPE65 again I think.  Either way if you have
questions, feel free to ask.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]