Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
From: Lee <ler762 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:27:49 -0400

On 8/31/12, Bill.Ingrum () t-systems com <Bill.Ingrum () t-systems com> wrote:
I think having a GRE tunnel for the internal routing protocol is

It might be, but we have a requirement for multicast over the wan so
the GRE tunnels had to be there.

 Can you explain the reasoning behind this?  I understand
the technical issue whereby GRE will allow multicast for EIGRP, OSPF,
etc, but why not just redistribute into BGP?

I see no reason to trust the provider that much.

I work on a lot of MPLS CE routers, and in general you can accomplish
anything you need by redistributing your internal routing protocol into
BGP, and adjusting LP, MED and AS Prepend as needed.

Sure.. but how do you *know* you're not getting anything added/removed
by the provider?




-----Original Message-----
From: Lee [mailto:ler762 () gmail com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Tribble, Wesley
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider

On 8/30/12, Tribble, Wesley <WTribble () sterneagee com> wrote:
Hello all,

I am an Network Operator working in an Enterprise environment with
offices all over the country(mostly connected via MPLS).  We are
currently working towards building a Disaster Recovery Site that will
host some of our vendor routers and provide the capability to access
these vendors from both our primary and backup data center locations.

The routes(as advertised by the vendor's routers) will be the same at
both locations.  I would like to advertise the routes from multiple
locations at the same time, rather than suppress the routes and
advertise conditionally.

At work, we have our internal routing protocol running on GRE over IPSec
tunnels & keep the BGP sessions with the MPLS provider limited to just
the MPLS network.  And have an ACL on the MPLS network
interface that allows only what's expected in...   some providers are
better than others at not having anything hit the 'deny any any log'


What is the best method to Instruct the provider's network to prefer
the Primary Data Center routes over the DR site?  Keep in mind that I
am only peering with the provider over BGP and I have no visibility to

the underlying MPLS architecture or configuration.  Although if you
have specific questions  about their architecture, I can work to get

Discussing in house, we have gone over a few different options:

-Advertise specific routes from primary site and summary routes from
the DR site.  Most specific will always be chosen.
-Prepend the routes from the DR site so that they will have a longer
AS-path than the Primary location -Use Community Strings to influence
local preference.(Still working to find out if Provider will pass our
community strings)

Just looking for some ideas and best practices.  Any thoughts or
insight would be much welcomed and appreciated.  This is my first
message on NANOG, so please be gentle.  I apologize in advance if I
have done something incorrectly.


**************************** Sterne Agee Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries request that you do not transmit orders and instructions
regarding your Sterne Agee account by e-mail. Transactional details do

not supersede normal trade confirmations or statements. The
information contained in this transmission is privileged and
confidential. It is intended for the use of the individual or entity
named above. The information contained herein is based on sources we
believe reliable but is not considered all-inclusive. Opinions are our

current opinions only and are subject to change without notice.
Offerings are subject to prior sale and/or change in price. Prices,
quotes, rates and yields are subject to change without notice. Sterne
Agee & Leach, Inc. member FINRA and SIPC, is a registered
broker-dealer subsidiary of Sterne Agee Group, Inc. Generally,
VALUE. Please contact your Financial Advisor with information
regarding specific investments.
Sterne Agee
reserves the right to monitor all electronic correspondence.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]