mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 End User Fee
From: "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:32:55 -0500
By end user I mean hosting clients (cloud, collocation, shared, dedicated, VPS, etc.) of any sort. For example you have
clients that would need....say /24 for their dedicated server. If you charge a $1.00/IP which is typical then you would
lose that revenue if they converted to IPv6. If you didn't charge for IPv4 then you have nothing to to lose.
From: Cutler James R [mailto:james.cutler () consultant com]
Sent: Fri 8/3/2012 3:48 PM
To: Otis L. Surratt, Jr.
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 End User Fee
On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:22 PM, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com> wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
I can't imagine that this would be anything but counterproductive. End users are not interested in IPv6 - most would
not recognize IPv6 if it fell out of their screen. End users want working connectivity, not jargon.
James R. Cutler
james.cutler () consultant com
Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cameron Byrne (Aug 03)
Re: IPv6 End User Fee William Pitcock (Aug 03)
Re: IPv6 End User Fee Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)