mailing list archives
Re: RADB entry
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:17:59 -0500
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Eric Krichbaum <eric () telic us> wrote:
Absolutely. I'd rather see it done responsibly. It's hard to get rid of
bad data/incorrect data/stale data and it shouldn't be. If done properly,
it would be much friendlier. There is incentive for people to put data in
but not to remove the other.
and in the name of expediency providers proxy-register for their downstreams...
notify: notify () flagtelecom com
changed: hostmaster () flagtelecom com 20100524
thanks flag, I needed that... could you remove it pls? (note I've
attempted a few times to get flag to remove this, so far no joy.
(one example of many...)
From: christopher.morrow () gmail com [mailto:christopher.morrow () gmail com] On
Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:51 AM
To: Eric Krichbaum
Cc: Chuck Church; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: RADB entry
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum <eric () telic us> wrote:
The origin being entered by a
provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it
accepted by anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being
forced to add a downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to their
'proxy registration'... so nice... now you can't control your prefix data in
radb, how quaint!
'proxy registration' - never a good idea... not ever... adding cruft that's
not connected to the data owner to the database? recipe for
stale/old-n-busted data... hurray.