Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Console Server Recommendation
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:15:53 -0600

We use WTI, too, just don't like it that it reboots to apply a change.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher O'Brien [mailto:obriapqz () bc edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:59 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Console Server Recommendation

On 1/30/12 11:08 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
What are people using for console servers these days?  We've
historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for
an upgrade.

OpenGear seems to have some nice stuff, anyone else?


I've been using Western Telematic TSM-40 console servers and have been 
very happy with the price point and feature set.

Also, I aggregate console connections from different parts of my campus 
over my existing fiber plant using TC Communications TC1880 Async Fiber 
MUXs.  This combination has served me well.





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]