Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:01:52 -0800

It has limitations, but, it's documented pretty well in the excellent Day One/Day Two Juniper books for IPv6 written by 
Chris Grundemann. 

However, as others have said, I strongly subscribe to the school of "don't do that, it leads to unnecessary pain and 
provides little benefit.

Owen

On Feb 12, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:

Hello,

keith tokash wrote:
I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.
We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered;

I haven't really looked very hard, since I subscribe to the stated reasons for keeping v4 and v6 sessions apart. 
(migration, max-pfx, ...)

BUT

To my knowledge, JunOS doesn't even support using a single TCP session to exchange routes of all address families. If 
someone knows how to do this - if even for just IPv4 and IPv6 unicast - let me know ... ;-)

-- 
       Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy
       World Wide Web: www.axu.tm



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault