Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
From: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim () brandontek com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:13:39 -0500

Never messed around with Juniper....

From: leigh.porter () ukbroadband com
To: brandon.kim () brandontek com; blake () pfankuch me; jay () miscreant org; jra () baylink com
CC: nanog () nanog org
Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim () brandontek com]
Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
To: blake () pfankuch me; jay () miscreant org; jra () baylink com
Cc: nanog group
Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it

But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
in the near future...

Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with 
some more structure like Juniper?

Leigh Porter

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]