On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
IPv6 is operational.
How is this a misconception? It works fine for me...
Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who implements v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6
site that has perhaps v6-only accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has resolvers that operate
only over v4.
*huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational.
You can break anything if you try hard enough.