Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing?
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:56:18 +0530

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
They do internal aggregation of common prefixes to keep their internal
tables small, see for instance this rather old preso:

http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt

why should swisscom pay for your traffic engineering?

Nobody at all is asking them to pay for it.  But do you seriously
expect their routing tables to become full to bursting because, for
example, they checked the ARIN route registry, RADB etc instead of
blindly using minimum prefix size defaults?

Or are swamp space legacy IP ranges with minimum prefix size of /24
that easy to get in this day and age?

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault