mailing list archives
Re: time sink 42
From: Joel M Snyder <Joel.Snyder () Opus1 COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:32:07 -0700
On 2/16/12 2:23 PM, nanog-request () nanog org wrote:
time sink 42
Others have already noted the difference between TZ and M tapes; the TZ
tapes are also supposed to be 'better' in that they are laminated, while
the M tapes are not and may decay more quickly.
However, the problem I have is that the "better" label maker (the one
that takes TZ tapes) is not nearly as easy to use as the "cheaper" one,
the M-compatible P-touch. I knew that I didn't want a bunch of useless
features, so I bought the cheapest TZ-compatible P-touch I could find,
the 1290, but it is about twice as hard to get anything done with it as
the bottom-of-the-line $19.95 P-Touch that takes M tapes.
Anyone got a solution for *that* particular problem? Should I get a
better TZ-compatible labeler?
Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719
Senior Partner, Opus One Phone: +1 520 324 0494
jms () Opus1 COM http://www.opus1.com/jms
RE: time sink 42 Scott Berkman (Feb 16)
Re: time sink 42 david raistrick (Feb 16)
Re: time sink 42 Joe Greco (Feb 17)
Re: time sink 42 Joel M Snyder (Feb 16)