mailing list archives
Re: Common operational misconceptions
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:03:32 +0900
Owen DeLong wrote:
I believe he understands just fine. However, his point (and I agree with him) is that
if you are behind NAT, it isn't full end-to-end functionality, even if it does allow some
degraded form of end-to-end connectivity with significant limitations which are not
present in the absence of NAT.
I'm not interested in your own definitions on end-to-end
For correct terminologies, you should read Saltzer's
As for "in the absence of NAT", RFC3102 may also be helpful
This document examines the general framework of Realm Specific IP
(RSIP). RSIP is intended as a alternative to NAT in which the end-
to-end integrity of packets is maintained.