Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:56:32 +1100

In message <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211270628380.27834 () uplift swm pp se>, Mikael Abrah
amsson writes:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote:

Yet everyone (except you) insist that it does work with everything, and 
that all this CGN and 444 stuff and 644 stuff isn't necessary, and that 
I'm a fool for doubting all these (to me) wildly overoptimistic 
assertions about the coming ubiquity of native IPv6, end-to-end, heh.

Dual stack works with "everything". IPv6 only access does not (with 
464XLAT it might). However, people are complaining that operators are 
focusing more on CGN and NAT44(4) than they are on IPv6. Which I can 
understand, but I believe we're getting closer to getting out of the dead 
lock. My hope is that 2013 is going to be the year we're going to see 
widespread IPv6 (dual stack) adoption on mobile devices outside of the US. 
It's looking good so far.

People are advocating dual stack now (at least that's what I do), for a 
future goal of IPv6 only.

The main problem with IPv6 only is that most app developers (most 
programmers totally) do not really have access to this, so no testing is 
being done.

IPv6 only is easy to setup if you already have dual stack.

On my Mac it is "System Preferences", "Network Preferences",
"Advanced", "TCP/IP", "IPv4 -> Off" then reboot to clear any lingering
IPv4 references.

It's about as easy on a Linux and a *BSD box.

Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]