Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:34:24 +1100


In message <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211271746210.27834 () uplift swm pp se>, Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote:

Obviously, they deployed IPv6 for other reasons, and it would be far 
more useful to know *why* they deployed it in the first place (i.e., as 
an experiment, because their user base is outstripping their IPv4 
allocations, etc.).

IPv6 deployment is not a short-term answer to IPv4 exhaustion. Can we 
please just put this to rest?

But it will reduce the dollars that need to be spent to continue
to prop up IPv4.  Every IPv6 packet sent is one less packet that
needs to be processed by the CGN *farm*.

Split the bill so you can see the IPv4 and IPv6 traffic components
and add a CGN loading on the IPv4 traffic.

Mark
-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]