Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 23:35:33 +0100

On 3 Apr 2013, at 23:20, Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com> wrote:
Try it with upwards of 900ms of variable latency. 

The last crazy result I got was 146mbit/s on a hardwired 100 mbit link  and 1-2ms latency to the speedtest.net server I 
was using at the time (same data centre).  Testing this sort of thing with high latency and jitter is understandably 
hard, but I didn't see a good reason at the time why it should have been so badly out with good underlying network 
characteristics.

Nick





Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device



-------- Original message --------
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> 
Date: 04/03/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00) 
To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Subject: Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test 


On 3 Apr 2013, at 22:48, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
(If anybody's got evidence of it reporting more than the link is technically
capable of, feel free to correct me...)

I've seen speedtest.net give results significantly greater than the physical bw of the client's network link.

Nick





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]