Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 17:29:40 +0200 (CEST)

On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

RFC4989 TCP Extended Statistics MIB. M. Mathis, J. Heffner, R.
    Raghunarayan. May 2007. (Format: TXT=153768 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED
    STANDARD)

Looks like a taker to me.  Also, see the work the Web10G group is doing for
Linux: http://www.web10g.org

RFC 4989 doesn't seem to officially exist. Ah, it's 4898.

Yes, RFC4898 seems to contain a lot of interesting information, question is how to destill this down to something the user can understand and that is of interest for a support engineer who might be trying to diagnose the customer problem.

I agree web10g seems to be of interest as well. I'm going to read through their documents tomorrow.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault