mailing list archives
RE: route for linx.net in Level3?
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:32:52 +0200
The older school of thought was to put all of the edge interfaces into the
IGP, and then carry all of the external routes in BGP.
I thought people where doing it because IGP converged faster than iBGP and
in case of an external link failure the ingress PE was informed via IGP that
it has to find an alternate next-hop.
Though now with the advent of BGP PIC this is not an argument anymore.
Re: route for linx.net in Level3? John Kemp (Apr 04)
Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Randy Bush (Apr 04)
Re: route for linx.net in Level3? Brian Dickson (Apr 04)
- RE: route for linx.net in Level3?, (continued)