Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 () mac com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 09:12:24 +0200

CGN is just a solution to save time, it is not a transition mechanism through IPv6
At the end (IPv6 at home) you will need at list :
Dual stack or NAT64/ DNS64

My 2 cents

On Apr 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:

On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:

I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support v6 would be vs deploying the cgn equipment 
and funneling users through that :(

IPv6 deployment is not a short term solution to IPv4 address depletion. Would you be less upset if there was IPv6 
access and CPE based DS Lite (ie your IPv4 is still CGN:ed, just in a different way)?

CGN is here to stay for IPv4. The solution for long term Internet growth is IPv6.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]