mailing list archives
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:38:15 +0000
The End-user IPv6 prefix can be constructed using whatever techniques
independent of MAP etc. in any deployment requiring IPv4 address sharing.
What is interesting is that the MAP enabled CPE could parse certain bits
of that IPv6 prefix to mean something for MAP. That's it. Attached is a
screenshot to illustrate this very point.
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds () gmail com>
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 3:48 PM
To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
In what sense do you mean that? The end-user IPv6 prefix certainly ties
IPv4 and IPv6 together, hence the interest in the Light-Weight IPv4 over
On 08/04/2013 3:13 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.