Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:36:13 -0500

Once upon a time, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> said:
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specifically* to cater 
to the fact that HTTPS requires a dedicated IP per DNS name?

Is that a statistically significant percentage of all the IPs in use?

I have no numbers, but my gut feeling is that there are a lot more
eyeballs than web servers with lots of IPs.

Wasn't there something going on to make HTTPS IP muxable?  How's that coming?

SNI; RFC 3546

How fast could it be deployed?

The RFC is just shy of 10 years old, so that's like a baby compared to
IPv6.

It is mostly deployed, but there's still a fair number of old clients
that don't support it.  WinXP+IE is probably the biggest fail, followed
by Android < 3.0 and BlackBerry.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault