mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:27:22 -0400
On Apr 26, 2013, at 00:19 , joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question, which I'd know the answer to if I ran bigger
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specifically* to cater
to the fact that HTTPS requires a dedicated IP per DNS name?
It doesn't, or doesn't if if your clients are not stuck in the past.
TLS SNI has existed for a rather long time.
Is that a statistically significant percentage of all the IPs in use?
Wasn't there something going on to make HTTPS IP muxable? How's that coming?
there are stuborn legacy hosts.
How fast could it be deployed?
you can use it now.
Sure, you "can".
But no one will. No one (especially someone doing SSL content) wants 99% connectivity. And there's a lot more than 1%
XP out there. (Hrm, that explanation works to explain why to a couple decimal places 0% of the Internet is on v6 only
RE: IPv6 and HTTPS David Hubbard (Apr 26)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS joel jaeggli (Apr 26)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Don Gould (Apr 26)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)