mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:46:52 -0400
On Apr 26, 2013 12:29 AM, "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 00:19 , joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question, which I'd know the answer to if I ran
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specifically* to
to the fact that HTTPS requires a dedicated IP per DNS name?
It doesn't, or doesn't if if your clients are not stuck in the past.
TLS SNI has existed for a rather long time.
Is that a statistically significant percentage of all the IPs in use?
Wasn't there something going on to make HTTPS IP muxable? How's that
there are stuborn legacy hosts.
How fast could it be deployed?
you can use it now.
Sure, you "can".
But no one will. No one (especially someone doing SSL content) wants 99%
connectivity. And there's a lot more than 1% XP out there. (Hrm, that
explanation works to explain why to a couple decimal places 0% of the
Internet is on v6 only today.)
You like fuzzy math. OK.
RE: IPv6 and HTTPS David Hubbard (Apr 26)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS joel jaeggli (Apr 26)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Don Gould (Apr 26)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 28)
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Randy Bush (Apr 28)