Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:22:30 -0700

On 04/29/2013 11:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

If the existing cards handle CGN without additional licensing, then the only real cost is personal, my sanity, and the 
company need/will not factor that in.

One thing to consider is what the new support load will be from issues dealing
with CGN causing new breakage. That might be baked into your support already,
but at larger scale it probably isn't. Maybe it's marginal, but it's worth asking.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]