Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: turning on comcast v6
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:42:04 +0000

On 12/11/13, 2:32 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared () puck nether net> wrote:


I'll chime in with a link to data:

http://www.google.com/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption

Looking at things, USA is at 5%+ adoption, which is due to the hard work
of folks at Comcast (and other ISPs).

Overall google is seeing 2.5%+ of traffic over native IPv6.  in several
cases IPv6 is actually faster than IPv4:

Anyone else have a good base of comparative performance data with large
data sets / lots of end points?

- Jason


16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=0 hlim=57 time=18.649 ms
16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=1 hlim=57 time=19.008 ms
16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=2 hlim=57 time=18.959 ms
^C
--- puck.nether.net ping6 statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 18.649/18.872/19.008/0.159 ms

PING puck.nether.net (204.42.254.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=32.920 ms
64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=18.467 ms
64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=22.014 ms
64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=20.807 ms
64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=19.096 ms
^C
--- puck.nether.net ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 18.467/22.661/32.920/5.280 ms

- jared



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]