Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: do ISPs keep track of end-user IP changes within thier network?
From: Paul Stewart <paul () paulstewart org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:09:56 -0500

Back in the day (geesh I feel old just saying that), I deployed a lot of
PM3’s …. Then we moved to Ascend TNT Max stuff - that was very exciting
back then! 

:)

Paul


On 12/16/2013, 3:16 PM, "Vinny_Abello () Dell com" <Vinny_Abello () Dell com>
wrote:

Dell - Internal Use - Confidential

PM3's were pretty solid. PM4's, not so much. They were often problematic
requiring periodic reboots of the entire chassis to keep them sane even
right up through the last firmware release until Lucent killed them off
in favor of their newly acquired Ascend equipment. The team that designed
them were good guys. We used to work directly with them on issues and get
early access to beta releases of new firmware for the PM's, including new
cutting edge protocols such as K56Flex and later V.90. :)

-Vinny

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Kamtha [mailto:kamtha () ak-labs net]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 3:05 AM
To: sam () circlenet us
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: do ISPs keep track of end-user IP changes within thier
network?


The PMs were fantastic.

PM3's were pretty good as well. 2 PRIs or T1s.. 48 56k digital modems, +
ISDN support.. :)

Carlos. 

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:21:18PM -0500, Sam Moats wrote:
I still have a soft spot for the Portmasters :-). We had rows of PM2's
with US robotics 33.6K sportster modems attached on 8mm tape racks.
Back when a town of 40K people could all connect through 2XT1's and
everyone was happy.
Sam Moats

On 2013-12-13 16:59, Jon Lewis wrote:





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]