Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:34:27 -0500

On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:03:59 -0500, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Not counting MAC users, because they cannot do DHCPv6 without 3rd party software.

My Macs seem to do DHCPv6 just fine here without third party software, so I'm not sure what you are talking about.

I've heard many reports of apple not supporting DHCPv6 up to 10.7. After much digging, I have found a single report of it working in 10.8. So, if you're up-to-date, you wouldn't notice it either. :-)

Nobody really cared with they limited what RFC1918 space you could use. (not sure they're still doing that.)

Not sure what you mean here since RFC-1918 is IPv4 only.

Just providing an example of AT&T Uverse lunacy that hasn't resulted in millions of customers leaving. If you want an IPv6 example, their recent 2wire firmware update that broke proto-41 tunnels has met with an equally fervent "gee-whiz, att" response.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault