mailing list archives
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:20:05 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Barton" <dougb () dougbarton us>
On 1/28/2013 6:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
To paraphrase Guy L Steele:
If we are this far on into the "new IPv6 world" and that question is
one which can be answered by a link on the first page of ghits for
'implementing IPv6', then the IPv6 people have blown it badly.
Can you show me the equivalent link for "I want to implement IPv4 on
IPv4 is mature enough that for small to medium sized networks, the answer
is "you plug everything in".
My appraisal of v6 is that it's an order of magnitude (or two) more complex
than that, both in 'attack' surface and interoperability issues.
But, I suppose, it took me a couple years to really learn IPv4 well.
That said, *having* learned IPv4 relatively well, I remain surprised
that there's as much additional (perceived) complexity in v6.
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers Jay Ashworth (Jan 28)
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers Eugeniu Patrascu (Jan 28)