Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IP4 address conservation method
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 19:15:38 -0400

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Ricky Beam <jfbeam () gmail com> wrote:
I won't argue against calling Linux "wrong".  However, the linux way of
dealing with ARP is well tuned for "host" and not "router" duty.

I love Linux and use it throughout my work but I can't tell you the
number of times its ARP behavior has bitten me. If you send a packet
to a VIP on a Linux box and it doesn't have an arp entry for the
default gateway, the Linux box will send an arp request... with the
vip as the source. That is just wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Use the
damn interface IP when you arp for something on that interface. If the
router doesn't happen to like the bad arp (since the VIP isn't on the
router's LAN) the router will ignore it. And your service will merrily
pop up and down depending on whether the Linux box has any traffic to

Okay, I'm done venting now.


William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]