Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Google's QUIC
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:00:08 -0400

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com> wrote:
"In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has the
potential to allow the different data flows, coming and going to a client,
to be served on a single server." - Google

I'll drink the juice

i don't think much juice is required... doesn't that just say that the
same 'flow' will follow the same path through the network? and that
most/all (save a10/yahoo!) loadbalancers just LB based on 5-tuple (at
best)? so keeping things in a single flow/stream/5-tuple will drop
packets from one host deterministicaly on a single other host at the
far side?


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]