Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Google's QUIC
From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:27:48 -0400

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () janoszka pl> wrote:
I am surprised nobody mentioned security issues. To minimize latency the
following would be best: the client sends one UDP packet and receives
stream of UDP packets with page code, styles, images and whatever else
could be needed. The waiting time is just RTT plus browser processing.

I am sure Google considered it, so I am really curious how they are
going to solve it.

Of course they consider this. Read the "CONNECTION ESTABLISHMENT and
RESUMPTION" section of their design document [1]. If you're familiar
with TCP Fast Open, many of its techniques are reused.

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqsQx7rFV-ev2jRFUoVD34/edit

--
Darius Jahandarie


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]