mailing list archives
Re: distributed nmap?
From: Arturo Busleiman <buanzox () usa net>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 23:33:39 -0300 (ART)
Why not adding a --agent x.x.x.x [port] parameter?
It would turn nmap into an agent, and the 'boss' client would be running
at x.x.x.x (port [port] if specified)
It would be easier, the boss client would be nmap --boss n
it then would sit there waiting till 'n' agents connect, then allowing to
enter scan options/targets, send them to each agent (of course, it would
distribute the port range among them!!).
what do you think of this?
*> Panic? My kernel doesn't panic! We are doomed! DustDustDust!!!!
*> Get PGP KEY: use pgpk -a hkp://horowitz.surfnet.nl/buanzox () usa net
*> System Fork BBS, en Argentina! (5411) 4799-2510 Dedaparamaxxaginos rules!
Re: distributed nmap? Ripclaw (Mar 19)
Re: distributed nmap? Simple Nomad (Mar 21)