|
Nmap Development
mailing list archives
Re: C++ Development
From: Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu () deaddrop org>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 22:44:42 -0700
"Jay Freeman (saurik)" wrote:
BTW, about that "can't link to C" argument, I actually have a complaint
against that one that I didn't think of when I decided to agree with Fyoder.
[snipped most of your argument]
It's true that you can link your C++ module in apache, and just as
easily in nmap as well. That's the nice thing about using such a closely
related language. The really cool thing is that I can link perl and lisp
in as well, since C is quite forgiving of foreign function calls.
Although that may be because my compiler was just smarter than most, so I am
still going to cede that nmap should continue forward in C, and I'm even
going to extend that to nmap+V.
No need, unless you feel it. In answer to part of your other post, C is
not my preferred language, I just think that nmap is best off staying in
C. LISP is my preferred language, and Perl would be second. Any
assembler (excluding BAL) would be third, and C is a mere fourth.
Stou Sandalski wrote:
P.S.
IMHO Since Fyodor made his point this "thread" has no place on
the list....
Well, I suppose if Fyodor wants it to stop, he'll step right up and say
so. I am finding it useful, and interesting. Saurik, my dear, I am
composing a long answer to your long post, but it deserves more
attention that I can give it right this minute. Stay tuned.
.shrdlu
--
Computer security is an oxymoron.
Prepare for the worst.
-- Bruce Schneier
---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- RE: C++ Development, (continued)
Re: C++ Development Fyodor (Sep 12)
Re: C++ Development Dragos Ruiu (Sep 12)
|