Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99
From: "Gisle Vanem" <giva () bgnett no>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 01:54:11 +0200

"Fyodor" <fyodor () insecure org> said:

Is there a good reason for not bailing if gmap is NULL?  The point is
to detect cases where the code munmap's a file that it hasn't even
mmap'd (or if it munmaps a file twice).  Other than these cases of API
misuse, does the (gmap == 0) check cause any problems?

You're correct. That patch isn't needed. But IMHO, we should try to 
make a stack of mapped files for Win32.

--gv


---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]