On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:23:15PM -0700, Stou Sandalski wrote:
> I hope this doesn't start a flame-war but considering you've
> re-written such large portions of the thing, wouldn't a major version
> increment be waranted (i.e. nmap 4.0a1)
At the rate I've been pumping out (alpha) releases, it seems like I'd
be well past 4.0 before the public release :). Actually I want to
write a 2nd generation OS detection system and make many other
improvements before calling it 4.0. But I agree that the version
number should be bumped. If I call it 3.59, some uninformed people
probably wouldn't upgrade from 3.55 just because they are so close.
I'm currently favoring 3.70.
Cheers,
Fyodor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to
nmap-dev-help@insecure.org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Received on Aug 26 2004
Intro
