Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: MAC replies
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:28:20 -0700

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 09:17:43AM -0400, Adam Jacob Muller wrote:
Now that nmap has the ability to log MAC addresses does it use the fact 
that it got an arp reply to establish that the host is in fact up, my 
idea here basically is that an ARP reply is basically the only sure way 
to determine if a host is up or not, if you don't get one, then that 
host must be down, if you do in 99.99% of cases it is up (feel free to 
correct me), so does, or should nmap use a positive ARP reply to say 
that the host is up?

Yes, ARP scanning is definitely high on my "todo" list.  But Nmap does
not yet actually do ARP at all.  It just so happens that the IP packet
responses Nmap gets include the ethernet headers as well.  So Nmap
grabs them that way.  Once Nmap learns to speak raw ethernet in a
portable fashion, ARP scanning (which obviously will only work on a
local network) will not be far behind.

Cheers,
-F

---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]