Re: Performance of multiple nmaps

Regretably this is out of the question ;-)

Due to the kind of jobs we need to do, we face the need of scanning ALL ports on certain ranges, that usually are medium size.
We already have several scanning boxes, all with identical hardware/software.

So far the testing WITHOUT iptables (in particular ip_conntrack) seems promising... let's see when we have more nmaps running.
Cheers,

Miguel

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo_at_buanzo.com.ar>
To: nmap-dev_at_insecure.org
Subject: Re: Performance of multiple nmaps
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:42:00 -0300

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Miguel Dilaj wrote:
> > Hi bro!
> > Things are OK, hope you & your familiy are allright.
>
> Good to hear that. My son is OK, but I divorced two months ago.
>
> > I tried mostly everything mentioned here:
> > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/eserver/library/es-033104.html
> > to no avail.
>
> Then maybe you need to rethink the whole thing. Why do you need to
> run that much nmap instances, on
> the whole port range, and with -T0? Wouldn passive scanning be of any help?
>
> - --
> Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar
> Consultor en Seguridad Informatica
> President, Open Information System Security Group - Argentina
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFC1muoAlpOsGhXcE0RAth+AJ9p2TjdiQXWNpGz9fBGeWtxq/eXkQCbBlmj
> l3++snG5WaDQbG3wJzYyIfY=
> =8KnY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev

-- 
_______________________________________________
NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once.
http://datingsearch.lycos.com
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev