Space or no space, does not matter - tested right now on my Gentoo box:
$ nmap -sP -p1-1024 192.168.1.5
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-10-12 12:47
CEST
No ports specified -- If you really don't want to scan any ports use
ping scan...
QUITTING!
$ nmap -sP -p 1-1024 192.168.1.5
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-10-12 12:47
CEST
No ports specified -- If you really don't want to scan any ports use
ping scan...
QUITTING!
daniel_at_a03-0106a ~ $
$ nmap -V
Nmap version 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
AgentSmith15 wrote:
> I am sure there is supposed to be a space after the -p like "-p 1-1024".
> I've done the same thing in the Win32 version and it took me awhile to find
> out the problem :p
>
>
> On 10/12/06, Hari Sekhon <hpsekhon_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I've got 4.11 on Gentoo and I have just verified this:
>>
>> # nmap -sP -p1-1024 192.168.1.5
>>
>> Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-10-12 09:23
>> BST
>> No ports specified -- If you really don't want to scan any ports use
>> ping scan...
>> QUITTING!
>>
>>
>> -h
>>
>> Hari Sekhon
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike Wallette wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> While running nmap against a host on my internal network today, I
>> specified a pair of mutually incompatible options by mistake. nmap
>> displayed an error message and terminated without running the scan, as it
>> should, but the error message returned didn't quite match the problem:
>>> $ sudo nmap -sP -v -v -v -p1-1024 192.168.3.62
>>>
>>> Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-10-11 09:36
>> AKDT
>>> No ports specified -- If you really don't want to scan any ports use
>> ping scan...
>>> QUITTING!
>>> $
>>>
>>> As you can see, I *was* using a ping scan, and I *did* specify
>> ports. Of course, that was the problem--you shouldn't specify ports when
>> running a ping scan. Not a big problem, but I thought I would point it out,
>> in case you'd like to fix it.
>>> Here is the relevant system information regarding the host from which I
>> was running the scan:
>>> $ uname -a
>>> Linux 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 20 15:51:03 AKDT 2006 i686
>> Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2600 @ 2.16GHz GNU/Linux
>>> $ sudo nmap -V
>>>
>>> Nmap version 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
>>> $
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Michael Wallette
>>> mike_at_gecko-ak.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
>>> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
>>> Archived at http://SecLists.Org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
>> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
>> Archived at http://SecLists.Org
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on Oct 12 2006