Will add some filter rules. Not dangerous but still very unpleasant.
Thank you for your report.
David Matousek
Ron Bowes wrote:
> There are some results for "-sS -O 192.168.0.0/24" -- nothing exciting,
> but still.
>
> David Matousek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> 1) Thanks for --interactive, will be added. It is not a problem even
>> now, because
>> such Nmap session would be killed after timeouted. But of course, it is
>> better
>> to add it.
>>
>> 2) You can not execute shell-commands (erm :) you should not be able to).
>>
>> 3) You can scan local network but the machine firewall will show you
>> nothing.
>> Maybe also a good idea to add to filter just to save a few ticks of
>> processor time.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on Nov 30 2006
Intro
