Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark
From: GomoR <nmap-hackers () gomor org>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:56:39 +0100

On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:32:40PM -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
[..]
box, and group them. Then, you can use nmap again to only scan the ports that belong to a certain
group only, and discover each OS separately.

Well, by sending 8 probes, I do not see how you can be sure 
to hit only the target open port. It seems 'hope for the 
best' philosophy here.

Results will be unreliable to me.

-- 
  ^  ___  ___             http://www.GomoR.org/          <-+
  | / __ |__/          Systems & Security Engineer         |
  | \__/ |  \     ---[ zsh$ alias psed='perl -pe ' ]---    |
  +-->  Net::Frame <=> http://search.cpan.org/~gomor/  <---+

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]