|
Nmap Development
mailing list archives
Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark
From: GomoR <nmap-hackers () gomor org>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:56:39 +0100
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:32:40PM -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
[..]
box, and group them. Then, you can use nmap again to only scan the ports that belong to a certain
group only, and discover each OS separately.
Well, by sending 8 probes, I do not see how you can be sure
to hit only the target open port. It seems 'hope for the
best' philosophy here.
Results will be unreliable to me.
--
^ ___ ___ http://www.GomoR.org/ <-+
| / __ |__/ Systems & Security Engineer |
| \__/ | \ ---[ zsh$ alias psed='perl -pe ' ]--- |
+--> Net::Frame <=> http://search.cpan.org/~gomor/ <---+
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark, (continued)
Message not available
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark GomoR (Dec 28)
Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Alan Jones (Dec 28)
|