On 1/3/07, Andreas Ericsson <ae_at_op5.se> wrote:
> Checking for (and using) socklen_t is unnecessary. It will never change
> from being exactly the same as int.
After 5 minutes of reading other packages rants about socklen_t vs int
it's obvious we're not the only ones who have had to deal with this.
Thanks POSIX!
Seems like the easiest solution is to do s/socklen_t/int/g then.
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on Jan 03 2007