DePriest, Jason R. wrote
> You missed what I thought was the most obvious interpretation. The
> picture is of his own penis and he is a minor. I doubt you can be
> considered a child pornographer if you are, in fact, a child.
You guys are screwing up my bayesian spam filters. I keep marking this
thread as not spam, but now spamassassin is getting confused...
:-/
-smithj
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on Jan 19 2007