Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature
From: majek04 <majek04 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:01:51 +0200

On 7/4/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
I'll take a look at it - maybe there is an easy way to replace
receive_lines with your buffer-approach, which seems more flexible anyway.

That could be.  It might even be best to add the feature to nsock
itself.  Or maybe you'll find it more convenient/performant to add it
at another layer.

Well. Actually I proposed this approach some time ago:
http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q4/0127.html

My patch implemented nsock buffering in next layer, after nsock.

Cheers!
Marek Majkowski

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]