Morten Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Fyodor wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:05:12PM +0200, Morten Gulbrandsen wrote:
>>
>>> # nmap -A -T4 scanme.nmap.org playground
>>>
>>> Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-10-14 14:56 CEST
>>> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.64.0.0
>>>
>> Thanks for the report, but please resend your message to
>> nmap-dev_at_insecure.org rather than nmap-hackers. Also, it would help
>> if you include the results of the command "nmap --iflist" in your
>> report.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -F
>>
>
> sure .
> bash-3.00$ nmap --iflist
>
> Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-10-16 23:50 CEST
> tcpip.cc: Failed to open ethernet interface (nge0). A possible cause on
> BSD operating systems is running out of BPF devices (see
> http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-dev/2006/Jan-Mar/0014.html).
> QUITTING!
> bash-3.00$ uname -a
> SunOS solaris-devx 5.11 snv_64a i86pc i386 i86pc
> bash-3.00$ su root
> Password:
> # bash
> # ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu
> 8232 index 1
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
> nge0: flags=201000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500
> index 2
> inet 192.168.0.6 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
> ether 0:14:4f:21:45:fa
> nge1: flags=201000802<BROADCAST,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 4
> inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
> ether 0:14:4f:21:45:fb
> elxl0: flags=201004842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu
> 1500 index 3
> inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
> ether 0:50:4:89:fc:88
> lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu
> 8252 index 1
> inet6 ::1/128
> # netstat -nr
>
> Routing Table: IPv4
> Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
> -------------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ---------- ---------
> default 192.168.0.1 UG 1 93
> 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.6 U 1 14 nge0
> 224.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 U 1 0 lo0
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 4 lo0
>
> Routing Table: IPv6
> Destination/Mask Gateway Flags Ref
> Use If
> --------------------------- --------------------------- ----- ---
> ------- -----
> ff00::/8 ::1 U 1
> 0 lo0
> ::1 ::1 UH 1
> 28 lo0
> #
>
> # ping 192.168.0.1
> 192.168.0.1 is alive
> # ping 192.168.0.250
> 192.168.0.250 is alive
> # ping 192.168.0.254
> 192.168.0.254 is alive
> # tracert 192.168.0.1
> bash: tracert: command not found
> # traceroute 192.168.0.1
> traceroute to 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 localhost (192.168.0.1) 1.894 ms 7.567 ms 0.367 ms
>
>
> # nmap -A -T4 scanme.nmap.org playground
>
> Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-10-14 14:56 CEST
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.64.0.0
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
> 255.255.255.255
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 1.0.0.0
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
> 255.255.255.255
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.32.0.0
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
> 255.255.255.255
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
> 255.255.255.255
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
> 255.255.255.255
>
> WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
> 255.255.255.255
>
> Failed to resolve given hostname/IP: playground. Note that you can't
> use '/mask' AND '1-4,7,100-' style IP ranges
>
>
> http://bbs.chinaunix.net/viewthread.php?tid=670330
>
> has the same error.
>
> what can it be ?
>
>
>
> http://pastebin.com/f6679cb77
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org
>
# nmap --iflist
Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-11-03 14:15 CET
************************INTERFACES************************
DEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MAC
lo0 (lo0) 127.0.0.1/8 loopback up
nge0 (nge0) 192.168.0.6/24 ethernet up 00:14:4F:21:45:FA
nge1 (nge1) 0.0.0.0/0 ethernet down 00:14:4F:21:45:FB
elxl0 (elxl0) 0.0.0.0/0 ethernet down 00:50:04:89:FC:88
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.64.0.0
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
255.255.255.255
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 2.0.0.0
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
255.255.255.255
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 220.5.0.0
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
255.255.255.255
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to
255.255.255.255
WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 1.0.0.0
**************************ROUTES**************************
DST/MASK DEV GATEWAY
0.0.0.0/0 nge0 192.168.0.1
# uname -a
SunOS solaris-devx 5.11 snv_64a i86pc i386 i86pc
#
please help what can it be?
best regards
Morten
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on Nov 03 2007
Intro
