Home page logo
/

nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Time to lose gen1 OS detection?
From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:51:26 -0300

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Jens Link wrote:
time there are many old boxes which I like to identify. And I don't like
the thought of using two different nmap versions for this. 

I don't like that idea, either, BUT I recon that a smaller footprint is a good idea for _general_
usage. For example, I AM used to having two or three nmap versions in different directories: weirdly
patched ones, SVN ones, and official releases, too. That was kinda practical for the nmap talks I've
been giving. I could have a Qscan-enabled release, a development release, and a Stable release.



- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica
Servicios Ofrecidos: http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/
Unase a los Foros GNU/Buanzo - La palabra Comunidad en su maxima expresion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHJddOAlpOsGhXcE0RCs0cAJ9aM8roB36wrqq5IkiKmMIUv7t53gCcDtIT
luo4HmnQqCosZvkKAETvVLM=
=DvIq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]